The Schleicher Spin

The latest spin from author D. H. Schleicher on books, films and beyond…

Run Your Own Race

with 5 comments

Still gliding glibly along the high of my Democrats regaining control of Congress this past November, I turn to the early stages of what is shaping up to be an insanely interesting Presidential primary campaign.  2008 will mark the end of a ruthlessly wrong-headed regime that even its base at the Religious Right is having a hard time defending.  As we celebrate the New Year, the President’s image has sunk so low he can’t even muster some victory cries over the execution of mad Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein.  Sadly, it seems only a madman could perhaps keep Iraq together.  Hindsight is always 20-20, but that’s a topic for another time.  Here I will paint with hope the upcoming battle for President.  2008 just might be the year politics presents itself to the masses as something monumentally entertaining.  In these prenatal stages where some top candidates are still coyly dancing around their announcements to “officially run” two bona fide “celebrity politicians” are looking to shatter the glass ceilings that have hovered above them since the dawn of our great Republic.

On one side of the ticket you have Hillary Clinton, the now veteran New York Senator and former First Lady.  With President Bush’s ratings at an all time low, memories of those good ol’ Clinton years hover over Hillary like a shining halo.  She is still viciously hated in many circles, but hell, that didn’t stop Dubya Bush from getting two terms.  She has a great Senatorial track record, the support of her ex-president husband, and her ever increasing national spotlight to lead her to front runner status.   

Hillary has one major downside: it’s often hard to pinpoint her true political stance on certain issues.  The Iraq War especially will play a huge role in 2008, and her vague stance marred in that type of political doublespeak that sank Kerry’s 2004 bid makes it seem like she is skittish to wear that Liberal label or speak out against certain policies for fear of retaliation from the Right Wing.  For too long Democrats have been shying away from that in an attempt to appeal to the undecided masses in
Middle America.  Hillary should be wearing “liberal” like a badge of honor, and if she has any guts, she will hire some speech writers and public speaking experts who will help her avoid sounding like a slimy politician and more like that progressive liberal crusader Democrats so badly want her to be.  In the end, she’s going to come out swinging, and with a great number of people just looking to smash that glass ceiling to pieces, she’s the first ever viable female candidate for Leader of the Free World.

On the flip side, you have Barack Obama.  The Illinois Senator of mixed heritage is peaking fast.  He has a youthful charm and charisma, a nifty way of appearing at all types of events and making you feel like he belongs there (check out his recent visit to an evangelical mega church), and a progressive momentum that makes him the ideal choice of a “new generation.”  He also has some glaring stumbling blocks aside from the fact his middle name is Hussein.  There’s a significant portion of the population still unsure of who he is, and more importantly, scared to death of electing a “black” man.  His mixed heritage and upbringing as the son of black man from Kenya and white woman from Kansas and growing up in Hawaii bare not the hallmarks of the typical African-American experience, but instead the classic luster of your standard American immigrant “pull yourself up by your bootstraps” story.  This could play to his favor with Middle America, but it could also alienate him from his base.  Some are seeing echoes of JFK.  It will be fascinating to see how this plays out.

Still yet, we have the old stand-by, John Edwards, the only one of the major three to officially announce his candidacy.  Out of public office, but still very much in the public eye with speaking engagements and book signings, Edwards is still the man many Democratic faithful see as the guy who almost won the election for Kerry in 2004.  This former Vice Presidential candidate is cut from the same gritty populist stone as the mighty Democrats of the Bill Clinton years.  Like Bill Clinton, he has a powerful way of speaking, was once a crusading lawyer fighting for the “little guy,” is overflowing with Southern charm, and is highly educated.  His 2004 campaign of “Two Americas” is still going to ring true to many angry citizens looking for change and hope.  He’s lurking in the shadows right now behind the spotlight of Clinton and Obama, but he will emerge as the “safe bet.”  He’s the “classic” candidate, and those too nervous to make history, might settle for his earthy “grass roots” appeal.  For me, Edwards was the strongest candidate in 2004, and has the potential to be the strongest here in 2008.

Of course, if Al Gore (please…don’t run) or John Kerry (for the love of God, don’t run!) throw their hats into the ring, anything goes.  I can’t recall a primary where there were so many potentially great candidates.  With Clinton, Obama, and Edwards, I would wholeheartedly support any combination of two of the three.  Clinton seems too “big” to go the Vice Presidential route.  Likewise, I don’t think Edwards is going to be willing to play second fiddle again.  Obama, on the other hand, still the political novice, might be an ideal choice for a running mate for either of the other two.  A Clinton-Obama ticket might be so earth shatteringly progressive, I don’t know if it could be sold to those sitting on the fence.  Better yet, I still think some of us are dreaming of a Clinton-Clinton ticket, though that seems too fantastic to actually happen.  Sure, there’s nothing stopping an ex-president from being Vice President, except perhaps his all-powerful wife.

Still we have to be wary of the Republicans.  John McCain stands right now as the front runner.  Though he seems to have lost a bit of his backbone in his support of Bush and along with that some of his spitfire that made him such a formidable candidate back in 2000, he’s an old stalwart that has mass appeal to both moderate Republicans and Democrats.  He’s a classic character-a man who has spent most of his adult life in service to his country through the military and the Senate and has an amazing and harrowing tale of surviving a POW camp.  In any day and age, he makes for a great politician.  He’s setting up to be the perfect foe of what could be an overly zealous and slightly “ahead-of-its-time” and “peaking-too-soon” Democratic ticket.  His hardened wisdom and no-nonsense speak will go a long way. 

What will happen in 2008?  One way or another, history will be made…and for now, only time will tell.  Though still just a twinkle in the eyes of most voters, one thing is for sure, the race is on.

Written by David H. Schleicher

Written by David H. Schleicher

January 1, 2007 at 5:02 pm

5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Al Gore actually is who in the end, we probably will want to run. The Global Warming ticket might grab out attention more, unless we have another 9-11 between now and then. Honestly, America in the end will not nominate a woman, a black or an Edwards when it’s all said and done. It’s just the facts. McCain could have smooth sailing and the Republicans are probably drooling at a Hilary or Obama nomination.

    Horse Apples

    January 1, 2007 at 5:32 pm

  2. Very well written piece. I am a Republican, and since 2000 have been a McCain for President fella, but of the Democrats who are running or most likely will run, I am not that thrilled with anyone in particular. Hillary is out of the question of course (insert right-wing anti-Hillary comment here)…I was actually sorry to see Tom Daschle lose his seat in the Senate. I thought him to be a man of character and integrity. If he had kept his seat, I could see him running in ‘08 and, depending on the Republican candidate, could have got behind him.

    As for Bush, I thought he was ordained the GOP candidate in 2000 before any primary votes were even cast and that was a mistake. McCain would have been a much better President, and I would have been interested in seeing how he had handled and responded to 9/11

    nashvillephan

    January 3, 2007 at 8:59 pm

  3. I totally agree with your assesment of Bush. McCain was the far better choice in 2000, but nepotism got in the way.

    David Schleicher

    January 3, 2007 at 9:35 pm

  4. I think nashvillephan is right about Hillary. She might make it through the Dem primary, but a lot of people hate her a lot. And I don’t think she inspires fairweather Dems, and probably doesn’t particularly inspire normal Dems either. That’s why we have Obama-mania in the first place.

    As for John Edwards, I despise him because he lacks guts. Publishing a silly little picture book (‘Home: The Blueprint of Our Lives’) as a run-up to running for President isn’t very courageous and reeks of ‘playing it safe’. But you still might be right about him being the strongest candidate. Every Democrat President since Lyndon Johnson have all been Southerners. Maybe only Southern Dems can win in this country (although Gore didn’t).

    Anyway, all in all a good survey of the ‘08 situation. I’m looking forward to it too. Congrats on the novel.

    thestood

    January 4, 2007 at 12:47 am

  5. Thanks so much for the visit to E-Nirv, David! I was searching for a post of yours to comment upon, and who can resist a good ol’ political debate?

    First off, I’ll go on record as a conservative. Not a registered Republican, and therefore not a Kool-aid drinker.

    Tracking through your candidates one by one, here are soime thoughts:

    Hilary Clinton – I’ve never been a fan of Mrs. Clinton’s, for reasons both obvious to the eye and reasons more subtle. Philosophically, I believe her to be a liberal. I don’t hold to that line of thinking. ‘Nuff said. But I agree with something David touched on, that Hilary seems to be ashamed of showing what she truly believes. Nothing is healthier for politics than the TRUE exchange of ideals. Both Republicans nd Democrats pare their ideals in order to get elected rather than let the voters decide. It’s become a ‘win at all costs’ climate, one that adds to the confusion and betrayal I think we ALL feel as voters.

    Barack Obama – I have limited exposure to Sen. Obama, but from what I’ve seen I respect. He seems to be a straight shooter and someone that I can trust. Granted, his stances on political issues I have some disagreement, but integrity goes a long way with me. As far as the perceived “race” issue, let me speak for the Republican friends that I know. We could care less about the race OR gender of a President. What it boils down to for me is integrity, stance on issues, and command perception (that “IT” factor). The jury is still out on all of those for Obama, but I think he’s done well so far.

    John Edwards strikes me as too much of a pleaser to me, adjusting his stance to please his audience. The John Edwards I saw in the 2004 primaries did not seem to be one to gel idealistically with John Kerry, but saw him as an opportunity to gain the presumptive nod in eight years, should Kerry have been elected. Not the qualities I look for in a President.

    Al Gore/John Kerry. Democrats should hope beyond hope that these guys don’t run. Kerry has a lot of political baggage to overcome in the next year. Gore seems to be enjoying the role of rogue commentator, so much so that there is a lot of resentment on the side of Republicans, something Dems should be concerned about. Almost nothing hurts a candidate’s chances more than a strong anti-vote on the other side. And Gore’s got that in spades. Hilary Clinton has that as well, but support on her side may just be enough to overwhelm it.

    The Republicans will nominate John McCain, most likely having Rudy Giuliani as a running mate. The combo of the two (both moderate Republicans, both stirring a strong “patriotic” vote) may be tough to overcome. One thing’s for sure though, 2008 will be a very interesting one to watch.

    Thanks again for letting me have the floor, David!

    Please visit E-Nirv, our Entertainment Nirvana blog at http://www.geeksinger.wordpress.com

    geeksinger

    January 16, 2007 at 7:13 am


Leave a Reply